Showing posts with label american politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label american politics. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

pale in comparison


when comparing minorities palin just can't hold water against obama ... there's a story from the LA progressive that palin may have called obama 'SAMBO' ... i can't even be serious about racism anymore ... it's so old and tired ... i can only be sarcastic and facetious so all i can say is mcCain wasn't even smart enough not to get a potty-mouth VIP contender ... potty in her mouth ... yucky lady. should we revoke her minority card? sounds like that's what she wants ... she's not a minority ... she just a human republican (oxymoron?) who can get as racist as the best of em ... good to know miss sarah good to know.

Monday, September 8, 2008

now we payin fannie & freddie's bills too

in case you missed it ... us taxpayers who earn maybe $10 per hour (ok just me?) will be bailing out multi-billion dollar companies, fannie mae and freddie mac ... cuz nobody trusts their word that the loans they made to banks who used the money to lend to homebuyers will ever be re-paid ... or that's what they tell us ... is it coincidence that people who sit on the board of directors for fannie and freddie are second-cousins to g.w. bush? no.

but you are now confronted with a choice. you can find out what's really going on ... why are fannie and freddie so tied to our ENTIRE financial system? why do two companies control almost 50% of all u.s. mortgages? yes, i personally know the answer but ... do you? and now that it effects your pocket will you burry your ass in the sand and add fannie and freddie's bills to your own ... or will you inform yourself about what's really going on? cuz let me tell you ... us taxpayers outnumber congress. we outnumber fannie mae. if we refused to stand for this ... and acted collectively ... of course, something could be done. but what will you do now? ... keep surfing the web or sieze control of your destiny. it is a hard choice. and i love you no matter what but damn ... i'd really love ChANGE.

from cnn: Together, Fannie and Freddie own or guarantee more than half of the U.S. mortgage market - that's more than $5 trillion in loans.

Here's how they work: Banks loan money to home buyers. The banks then sell those mortgages - assuming they meet certain credit standards - to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

But without an "explicit" guarantee from the U.S. government, the stock of both companies continued to drop, and major investors - including the central banks of Russia and China - started selling Fannie and Freddie bonds fast. That made it harder, and more expensive, for Fannie and Freddie to raise money.

That guarantee that investors wanted is now explicit. The U.S. government is now in the business of buying and reselling mortgages, and Paulson and his cohorts hope that sends the message that Fannie and Freddie are safe.

The bad news - taxpayers could get stuck with a $200 billion bill for the bailout.

from bbc:The federal takeover is one of the largest bail-outs in US history.

"Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are so large and interwoven in our financial system that a failure of either of them would create great turmoil in financial markets here and around the globe."

from the springfield sun-times: "The bailout will give the mortgage industry a stability that we haven't had in a couple of years," said Rich Cosner, president of Prudential California Realty. "But frankly no, it won't help (struggling borrowers) to refinance."

Tuesday, September 2, 2008

'merica


hurricane gustav ... made me have an epiphany ....

my new theory is that america is no longer america ... at least not the america that many people BRAND and MARKET her to be (o.k. she never was but it's real obvious now) ... you know that "dream" of america which does include the 'american dream' version as well as this notion that we are a 'first world,' highly developed, super-CIVILIZed, leader of the 'free-market' world... when they took countries out of the 3rd world and put them in the first world, when they took africa, india, and latin america and colonized them the excuse was that europeans were more CIVILIZED ... cuz of, you know, real important things like they wore long skirts and ties and they ate with forks ...


but all that to say america is no longer america ... we are now a bootleg version of our own illusion ... let me explain why i'm downgrading us to business class, to third world, to the bottom of the international pecking order ...

i first thought this cuz of gustav. i mean ... how civilized is it not to rebuild the levees in four years ... but then again the rest of new orleans has also yet to be rebuilt hmmm ... and 85% of the people aint back (not an exact percentage) ... and many refugees still live in trailers issued by the government that turned out to be toxic and cause cancer ... and what about FEMA in GENERAL -- ... a gov. body that is as corrupt as nigeria (NOT an insult to nigeria) ... and then i thought about how the folks would evacuate and gas stations would run out of gas (not very american) and ATMs would be out of money (not american at all)


and supermarkets would have no food or water (so unamerican) and the traffic out of NO would turn a 7 hour drive into 20 hours (kinda american) ...


then i thought .... has the 9/11 destruction been re-built ... no ... there are still craters in the earth and condemned buildings in the bowery ... there is still no 9/11 memorial ...

which led me to think about where our money is at ... oh, iraq ... so if a future disaster or terrorist attack hit ... that shit wouldn't get rebuilt either ...


and this got me thinking about our infrastructure as a whole ... education (is that infrastructure? not sure but it's pretty fucking important) is at an all time low ... kids i taught in philly didn't know what or where the u.s. capital city was ... no bullshit ... and umm the dollar is now valued at less than the euro almost twice as less huh ... our current president is g.w. bush ... and it was americans who voted for him ... health insurance - what's left of it - SUCKS ... jobs that ALWAYS carried health care no longer even offer it ... if they do offer it it's like the cost of college ... and oh that's rising too and gov grants for college are also dwindling ... banks are closing and homes are foreclosing ... is the american dream moving into an apartment?


i would move to cuba but there's a hurricane there. i would move to canada but it's too cold. venezuela and brasil are the last two left on my list ... and ghana is definitely an option ...

cuz as far as i'm concerned this country is now just called 'merica -- it's fourth-world and dropping fast ...(no, i don't believe we can rank worlds it's just cuz i know AMERICA takes their ranking quite seriously.) i told yall ... it's HARD for me to love america with all her pre-occupation with ranking, order, money, materialism ... she always forgets that a country is only as strong as its PEOPLE. and it's only the people that make it a nation.

Friday, August 29, 2008

more break your heart news ...


sigh ... i think mcCain has officially lost it ... he watched the DNC convention and he forgot he was in america ... and then he picked his running mate. 44-year-old female gov. of alaska ... who is this lady? mcCain looks like an ass for picking a running mate with no experience and all the credentials that don't matter: opposite sex, opposite age, opposite skin tone ... could they have been anymore obvious and CONTRIVED? go hip hop republicans! your mcCain picked a winner! LOL how can i learn to love mcCain ... i am finding it hard to find any compassion for him so i'ma pray on that.

and who is this sad and sorry looking guy? this is the marine who just got aquitted of murdering four iraqis in falluja, iraq. he did that shit. and justice in america remains missing in action. maybe it's in iraq? nah, probly not. i remember reading about these murders in 2007 ... he did that shit. they acquitted him cuz there wasn't enuff 'evidence' or so the bbc article says. and there wasn't enough evidence cuz two of his fellow marines refused to testify ... i find it hard to feel love for these particular marines ... but actually it's easier to forgive them than john mcCain. these young men enter combat situations and lose their minds. i can dig it. what's mcCain's excuse .... ahh wait a minute ... maybe he thinks he's still in combat ...

now i feel compassion for them. i almost forgive them. but my observations still hold. i still want justice. you can feel both at the same time.

Friday, August 15, 2008

lost in translation: ludacris is politically here


ooooo i love it! more overt examples of hip hop's engagemnet in politics ...

i am sure some of you have heard about obama and ludacris ... ludacris made a song, "politics: obama is here," and obama denounced it blah blah ...

of course obama denounced it! hip hop is still villified ... he can't be associated with us clown ass negroes ... and i'm glad he knows it ... he knows how to play the game.

moving on: the song is hilarious and great! i just love hearing on my speakers "hillary hated so that bitch is irrelevant." YES! IRRELEVANT :) here's a clip of the song:



in the world of hip hop we all understand that ludacris did not in fact call hillary a bitch but referred to her using the pronoun, "bitch." now, the outside world and most presidential campaign managers will translate this song much differently (as they already have) ....

why do i love to hear this shit on my speakers? because it's art and opinion. it is not fact. i like to hear my experience expressed out loud and in public. i like to hear my world reflected in my speakers. it's also known as --- FREEDOM OF SPEECH. nothing more, nothing less.

you can read more and/or listen to an npr broadcast on this topic.

i can't wait for the fuckin REMIX bitches ..... ;0

Saturday, July 12, 2008

rainbow coalition?



honestly, i'm not THAT mad at jesse for this ... i feel that since it wasn't a public statement then he can say what he like. granted, the statement revealed jesse's bitterness, jealousy, and slight mental illness. other than that ... i think the only one who loses from this display of ignorance is jesse. he don't need more people telling him he was wrong ... i think he knows it deep down in his heart.

nikki giovani once wrote: black love is black wealth. is that why we so poor?

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

dust on thier cheeks

somalia is another hot spot ... no, not for vacation ... for war, hunger, starvation, displacement, refugee camps, terror, violence, rape, economic crisis, U.S. imperialism and probably a lot of thirst too ...

it's only getting worse (and we, as in america, helped to fuck it up more) ...

four-year-old Fatima walked with her family for two days to reach El Barde (to receive food):

(more) trouble in paradise

me, myself, personally never get tired of trying to understand the israel-palestine conflict. i do think it's a metaphor for something larger that i am also trying to understand (humanity). there is also something divine about that space and place which i hope to visit one day ... there is even something divine about israel and palestine ... is palestine the modern word for house of judah? i am reading the bible (it's long) so maybe i'm getting too biblo-technical or something like that ... some of you may not be familiar with judah ... i encourage you to research (i am not spoon-feeding you with a hyper-link this time ;)



all that long paragraph to say: there is more unrest and bloody terror as gaza has broken the most recent 'ceasefire' and now israel has shut the gaza border (again) ....

all that to say -- unlike the mainstream american media, i will not be ignoring pain and suffering in the world. i will be constantly reminding us ... there is much to be done in the world. much healing ... love could play a powerful role in the middle east. forgiveness being the key to peace. and compassion being the road to forgiveness. and love of self the doorway to compassion.

until then i'ma throw the blood and murder in ya face!

Thursday, June 19, 2008

oprah feeling some bLacklash

sometimes star magazine has important news ... AND reveals something important about america. i read in the june 16th edition (i was in the dentist's office no bullshit) that oprah is "losing it."

pasted on top of a big picture of oprah hugging barack obama are the words: "her ratings are down, her magazine is on the decline, and she is miserable."



the rag mag goes on to say "even tom [cruise] can't save her."

then they published the results of their poll which addressed the question: ARE YOU TURNED OFF BY OPRAH'S SUPPORT OF OBAMA? 61% of STAR rag mag readers said YES! and 39% said NO.

hmmmmmmmmmmmmm .......

what does this all mean? star mag readers are racist? fa sho! but what else? who reads star? many "average" americans who obsess about pop culture, superstars, and fame. but still, A LOT of people read that shit. and now more than half of them ain't fucking with oprah - cuz of barack. and i quote: "oprah's endorsement of democratic presidential candidate, Sen. barack obama made some fans change the channel."

WOW. first, i was struck because i thought white people and other americans would never turn their back on her. oprah is the beloved dark child of white america. oprah has often been the frustration of progressive, radical black americans because she was the beloved of white america and did little to change that image.

second, i was hit with the irony that oprah may have been right all these years. i can't lie, i won't front ... i hated on oprah cuz her show was whitewashed, she catered to whitey, she had damn near all-white audiences, she stayed away from controversial race issues for twenty years ... she used none of her PUBLIC influence to intervene in racial conflict ... she was very negro. old school. blah blah ... but ... maybe she was right.

if she had talked all that rah rah black power shit ... she might not be as famous as she is now ... she might not have as much money (fa sho) ... and she might not be so "well-respected" ... she might not have gained so much power ...

or maybe ... the lesson is that pandering to whitey always makes your power temporary ... at any moment they can revoke your race-invisibility card ... at any moment they can yank your power plug ... even after 24 years on air ... they can decide to paint you black and deem you powerless.

the rag mag says it all started to go downhill three years ago. "oprah's ratings dropped nearly 7% in the last three years. in that same time 'O' magazine lost 1 out of ten readers." gee ... what happened three years ago ... oh maybe barack anounced his candidacy and oprah threw her chips in with the BLACK MAN ...

these are the kinds of observations black people laugh about at the dinner table. i never thought star magazine (or any publication) would print a real article about it ... i know i know, it's star mag ... but it's indicative of larger society.

some very regular unassuming americans read STAR magazine (you'd be surprised) ... even some men read it ...

so now, i sit and wonder (as i often do about oprah) ... how does this make oprah feel? does she feel like she made a mistake? does she wish she could take her endorsement back and be race-neutral again? or was she biding her time - by waiting 24 years to come out publicly as a black person on her own terms, with millions in the bank? i'll probly never know ... and i am content with that.

as for star magazine ... i think i might boycott ... i think it's their turn for some blacklash.

we love you oprah (why not?)! keep the faith! (and get that school in south africa FIXED).

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

part II: obama's PAN-afrikan appeal

how a blackish president might be good for the wold as a whole ... they loving that nig in france ... you know ... FRANCE ... where black people rioted and burned up the streets for WEEKS last year (or the year before) and where they outlaw the muslim headscarf in SCHOOLS ... where they are often blatantly racist and black people (and others of color) are blatantly disenfranchised ... the whole notion of bam bam empowering people worldwide ... gives me tangles (same as tingles).

read the full article here ...

and here's a lil excerpt:
PARIS - "When Youssoupha, a black rapper here, was asked the other day what was on his mind, a grin spread across his face. 'Barack Obama,' he said. 'Obama tells us everything is possible.'"

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

be-late edition: bam bam's father's day speech

**[blogger's note: uh i pasted his whole joint below cuz i like to offer the entire context. to steal a phrase from a fellow blogger, this is why it's good to have a blackish president in amerikkka. bill cosby is proud right now.]**



Good morning. It's good to be home on this Father's Day with my girls, and it's an honor to spend some time with all of you today in the house of our Lord.

At the end of the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus closes by saying, "Whoever hears these words of mine, and does them, shall be likened to a wise man who built his house upon a rock: and the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house, and it fell not, for it was founded upon a rock." [Matthew 7: 24-25]

Here at Apostolic, you are blessed to worship in a house that has been founded on the rock of Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior. But it is also built on another rock, another foundation - and that rock is Bishop Arthur Brazier. In forty-eight years, he has built this congregation from just a few hundred to more than 20,000 strong - a congregation that, because of his leadership, has braved the fierce winds and heavy rains of violence and poverty; joblessness and hopelessness. Because of his work and his ministry, there are more graduates and fewer gang members in the neighborhoods surrounding this church. There are more homes and fewer homeless. There is more community and less chaos because Bishop Brazier continued the march for justice that he began by Dr. King's side all those years ago. He is the reason this house has stood tall for half a century. And on this Father's Day, it must make him proud to know that the man now charged with keeping its foundation strong is his son and your new pastor, Reverend Byron Brazier.

Of all the rocks upon which we build our lives, we are reminded today that family is the most important. And we are called to recognize and honor how critical every father is to that foundation. They are teachers and coaches. They are mentors and role models. They are examples of success and the men who constantly push us toward it.

But if we are honest with ourselves, we'll admit that what too many fathers also are is missing - missing from too many lives and too many homes. They have abandoned their responsibilities, acting like boys instead of men. And the foundations of our families are weaker because of it.

You and I know how true this is in the African-American community. We know that more than half of all black children live in single-parent households, a number that has doubled - doubled - since we were children. We know the statistics - that children who grow up without a father are five times more likely to live in poverty and commit crime; nine times more likely to drop out of schools and twenty times more likely to end up in prison. They are more likely to have behavioral problems, or run away from home, or become teenage parents themselves. And the foundations of our community are weaker because of it.

How many times in the last year has this city lost a child at the hands of another child? How many times have our hearts stopped in the middle of the night with the sound of a gunshot or a siren? How many teenagers have we seen hanging around on street corners when they should be sitting in a classroom? How many are sitting in prison when they should be working, or at least looking for a job? How many in this generation are we willing to lose to poverty or violence or addiction? How many?

Yes, we need more cops on the street. Yes, we need fewer guns in the hands of people who shouldn't have them. Yes, we need more money for our schools, and more outstanding teachers in the classroom, and more afterschool programs for our children. Yes, we need more jobs and more job training and more opportunity in our communities.

But we also need families to raise our children. We need fathers to realize that responsibility does not end at conception. We need them to realize that what makes you a man is not the ability to have a child - it's the courage to raise one.

We need to help all the mothers out there who are raising these kids by themselves; the mothers who drop them off at school, go to work, pick up them up in the afternoon, work another shift, get dinner, make lunches, pay the bills, fix the house, and all the other things it takes both parents to do. So many of these women are doing a heroic job, but they need support. They need another parent. Their children need another parent. That's what keeps their foundation strong. It's what keeps the foundation of our country strong.

I know what it means to have an absent father, although my circumstances weren't as tough as they are for many young people today. Even though my father left us when I was two years old, and I only knew him from the letters he wrote and the stories that my family told, I was luckier than most. I grew up in Hawaii, and had two wonderful grandparents from Kansas who poured everything they had into helping my mother raise my sister and me - who worked with her to teach us about love and respect and the obligations we have to one another. I screwed up more often than I should've, but I got plenty of second chances. And even though we didn't have a lot of money, scholarships gave me the opportunity to go to some of the best schools in the country. A lot of kids don't get these chances today. There is no margin for error in their lives. So my own story is different in that way.

Still, I know the toll that being a single parent took on my mother - how she struggled at times to the pay bills; to give us the things that other kids had; to play all the roles that both parents are supposed to play. And I know the toll it took on me. So I resolved many years ago that it was my obligation to break the cycle - that if I could be anything in life, I would be a good father to my girls; that if I could give them anything, I would give them that rock - that foundation - on which to build their lives. And that would be the greatest gift I could offer.

I say this knowing that I have been an imperfect father - knowing that I have made mistakes and will continue to make more; wishing that I could be home for my girls and my wife more than I am right now. I say this knowing all of these things because even as we are imperfect, even as we face difficult circumstances, there are still certain lessons we must strive to live and learn as fathers - whether we are black or white; rich or poor; from the South Side or the wealthiest suburb.

The first is setting an example of excellence for our children - because if we want to set high expectations for them, we've got to set high expectations for ourselves. It's great if you have a job; it's even better if you have a college degree. It's a wonderful thing if you are married and living in a home with your children, but don't just sit in the house and watch "SportsCenter" all weekend long. That's why so many children are growing up in front of the television. As fathers and parents, we've got to spend more time with them, and help them with their homework, and replace the video game or the remote control with a book once in awhile. That's how we build that foundation.

We know that education is everything to our children's future. We know that they will no longer just compete for good jobs with children from Indiana, but children from India and China and all over the world. We know the work and the studying and the level of education that requires.

You know, sometimes I'll go to an eighth-grade graduation and there's all that pomp and circumstance and gowns and flowers. And I think to myself, it's just eighth grade. To really compete, they need to graduate high school, and then they need to graduate college, and they probably need a graduate degree too. An eighth-grade education doesn't cut it today. Let's give them a handshake and tell them to get their butts back in the library!

It's up to us - as fathers and parents - to instill this ethic of excellence in our children. It's up to us to say to our daughters, don't ever let images on TV tell you what you are worth, because I expect you to dream without limit and reach for those goals. It's up to us to tell our sons, those songs on the radio may glorify violence, but in my house we live glory to achievement, self respect, and hard work. It's up to us to set these high expectations. And that means meeting those expectations ourselves. That means setting examples of excellence in our own lives.

The second thing we need to do as fathers is pass along the value of empathy to our children. Not sympathy, but empathy - the ability to stand in somebody else's shoes; to look at the world through their eyes. Sometimes it's so easy to get caught up in "us," that we forget about our obligations to one another. There's a culture in our society that says remembering these obligations is somehow soft - that we can't show weakness, and so therefore we can't show kindness.

But our young boys and girls see that. They see when you are ignoring or mistreating your wife. They see when you are inconsiderate at home; or when you are distant; or when you are thinking only of yourself. And so it's no surprise when we see that behavior in our schools or on our streets. That's why we pass on the values of empathy and kindness to our children by living them. We need to show our kids that you're not strong by putting other people down - you're strong by lifting them up. That's our responsibility as fathers.

And by the way - it's a responsibility that also extends to Washington. Because if fathers are doing their part; if they're taking our responsibilities seriously to be there for their children, and set high expectations for them, and instill in them a sense of excellence and empathy, then our government should meet them halfway.

We should be making it easier for fathers who make responsible choices and harder for those who avoid them. We should get rid of the financial penalties we impose on married couples right now, and start making sure that every dime of child support goes directly to helping children instead of some bureaucrat. We should reward fathers who pay that child support with job training and job opportunities and a larger Earned Income Tax Credit that can help them pay the bills. We should expand programs where registered nurses visit expectant and new mothers and help them learn how to care for themselves before the baby is born and what to do after - programs that have helped increase father involvement, women's employment, and children's readiness for school. We should help these new families care for their children by expanding maternity and paternity leave, and we should guarantee every worker more paid sick leave so they can stay home to take care of their child without losing their income.

We should take all of these steps to build a strong foundation for our children. But we should also know that even if we do; even if we meet our obligations as fathers and parents; even if Washington does its part too, we will still face difficult challenges in our lives. There will still be days of struggle and heartache. The rains will still come and the winds will still blow.

And that is why the final lesson we must learn as fathers is also the greatest gift we can pass on to our children - and that is the gift of hope.

I'm not talking about an idle hope that's little more than blind optimism or willful ignorance of the problems we face. I'm talking about hope as that spirit inside us that insists, despite all evidence to the contrary, that something better is waiting for us if we're willing to work for it and fight for it. If we are willing to believe.

I was answering questions at a town hall meeting in Wisconsin the other day and a young man raised his hand, and I figured he'd ask about college tuition or energy or maybe the war in Iraq. But instead he looked at me very seriously and he asked, "What does life mean to you?"

Now, I have to admit that I wasn't quite prepared for that one. I think I stammered for a little bit, but then I stopped and gave it some thought, and I said this:

When I was a young man, I thought life was all about me - how do I make my way in the world, and how do I become successful and how do I get the things that I want.

But now, my life revolves around my two little girls. And what I think about is what kind of world I'm leaving them. Are they living in a county where there's a huge gap between a few who are wealthy and a whole bunch of people who are struggling every day? Are they living in a county that is still divided by race? A country where, because they're girls, they don't have as much opportunity as boys do? Are they living in a country where we are hated around the world because we don't cooperate effectively with other nations? Are they living in a world that is in grave danger because of what we've done to its climate?

And what I've realized is that life doesn't count for much unless you're willing to do your small part to leave our children - all of our children - a better world. Even if it's difficult. Even if the work seems great. Even if we don't get very far in our lifetime.

That is our ultimate responsibility as fathers and parents. We try. We hope. We do what we can to build our house upon the sturdiest rock. And when the winds come, and the rains fall, and they beat upon that house, we keep faith that our Father will be there to guide us, and watch over us, and protect us, and lead His children through the darkest of storms into light of a better day. That is my prayer for all of us on this Father's Day, and that is my hope for this country in the years ahead. May God Bless you and your children. Thank you.

one answer?

NO!

... GOP is so scared. access more story here.

Friday, June 13, 2008

paint the white house black

oooooo she called ya mama ... a mama ... WHAT is going on in america today?



you can get full details at daily kos cuz i aint goin into the nitty gritty. all i'm fascinated by is the clash of cultures.

i don't think i'm offended per se ... i mean FOX news is just plain offensive on the regular. it generally offends me. outside of that i don't automatically reach for a can of whoop ass when i hear about all this hoopla with the baby mama comments about michelle obama ...

BUT whatever FIX news tells you - they did it on purpose. and they did it to be demeaning.



i think i get stuck at this auto-assumption that being a baby mama is a BAD thing ... is that NECESSARILY an insult? ... i personally happen to be a baby mama ... so .......

now, i will say that in the black community and our culture ... it's seen as an insult if that woman is actually some man's WIFE ... but it's not seen as an insult to baby mamas ... unless some trifling behavior is attached to it ...

but white america doesn't really know how we get down. the white media can't even find the vocabulary to discuss this. they don't have the historical context to bring any meaning to these words. and black journalists are struggling to come up with explanations they've never had to offer before.

white people of FOX news using the term 'baby mama' is kinda like when white people used to dress up in blackface. FOX news is parodying black culture by ATTEMPTING to use our language to describe us.

it's a clash. all of a sudden black culture hits the mainstream. white people are bumbling in their rush to now incorporate black lexicon into it's morning shows. if they could the white people would call all the black culture experts ... but there are none. who is the king of the streets?? who can translate language that moves organically and fluidly from county to county and state to state? who wrote the black language anyway?

LOL oooooooo it's so funny ... and black people who must appear on TV with white people don't know who wrote our language either ... cuz it has no king, it has no pro-genitor, it has no BABY DADDY ... it is natural and floating and all oral ...

so i say, be offended if you want cuz FOX meant to offend. but don't feel as if you have to ..... i prefer sitting back and laughing at white people and black people struggle to navigate a culture clash the likes of which none of us have ever experienced before ...

i am not even the slightest bit worried about black folks LOSING our culture ... we so resilient, we so inventive, we so creative, we so smart ... we keep coming up with shit so fast nobody (not the japanese, the europeans, the punjabs) and i mean nobody can keep up with us ...

guess it's just that we so blessed to be opressed.

(but truly i am not making a black supremacist argument - i was being sarcastic. there are others who are equally oppressed as black folk. AND other culture are equally resilient and smart - i was begin facetious because all culture works the way black culture works.)

i didn't mean to write this much on this topic ...

UPDATE: caught sight of this new blog at salon.com ... this dude takes offense and again ... attempts to find the roots of the term "baby mama" ... it's just interesting to watch him scramble around from jamaican patois to ... yawn.

Thursday, June 12, 2008

kkk for bam bam!

i came across a funny piece today on the southern poverty law center's hatewatch blog .... it's all about how white supremacist orgs are pro-obama because they think a black president will be the wake-up call white americans need ... you know the "worse-before-it-gets-better" argument ...

they think obama might make things so bad for white people that white people will remember they are white and join the KKK ... riiiiiiiight

what really scared me while reading this is the rigidity of racial division ... it's almost like racism is a play and everyone has their role. as if to say black characters always act this way and white characters always act this way. it struck me that racism - in this case - can be such a seductive CHOICE ... a chance to blame someone else when things aren't going right in your life ... an opportunity to never be accountable for your own failings ...

when the economy continues to slip and joe schmoe in wichita loses his job ... is he going to think it's obama's fault? (even though g.w put the economic policy in motion and it doesn't matter who the president is at the time) well, he just might ... cuz racism teaches us people are motivated by their skin color and when skin colors are different people become automatic enemies ... racism is so ... easy. you already know who has your back and you know who has it against you ... simple.

i do think racism works differently when the power dynamic is switched ... i.e. the process of racism is not the same for marginalized and opressed people ...

i am not saying it's better. and i am saying there is still a choice. but it processes in peoples' minds very differently and much more subconciously. read my earlier blog on how racism works for people of color. if you are a racist and you are reading this you will not be able to distinguish the intellectual nuance in my position.

which leads me to my final point ... racism is lazy thinking ... no matter what color you are. a group of people is never all bad or all good.

we are all fucked up human beings with our perfect imperfections. love me anyway?

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

geraldine is dirt

i read in a blog that geraldine ferraro was on TV talking more smack ... that ... woman ... had the nerve to talk shit about hip hop ... she insinuated that all hip hop is sexist .... she complained about barack obama referencing jay z's "dirt on ya shoulders" song ... she cited that as an example of how SEXIST this democratic primary has been ...

hip hop still has a bad name (duh) ... even after all the money it has yielded for sprite (and others of course) ... even after geraldine's own kids (does she have kids??) run out to buy the latest lupe fiasco or kanye west album ... even after all that, people - the elderly especially - associate hip hop with darkness, crime, depravity, mysogyny, low slung jeans, baggy clothes, guns, materialism, and noise ... i just wanted it on record ...

i cannot muster up any fuckin love for THAT WOMAN right now and i'm trying not to cuss her name, shit it's hard ... she just so racist, paranoid, ignorant, fake feminist ... she needs to shut the fuck up and sit the fuck down ...

i should just brush my shoulders off ...

(but i'd rather smack her in the mouth!)

Thursday, May 1, 2008

throwing the indiana factory under the bus and putting it back together again

yo! these fucking clintons get away with murder in the media ... they can fuck white house interns and come up golden with an earning potential of $100 million. they could murder you in broad daylight on the white house lawn ... and when the cameras show up while they are still digging your grave they can cackle and say it was a ... misstep?

my point is not that the rest of us are angels who never made a gaffe or transgression or have never been adulterers ... the point is that the MEDIA ignores their blatant lies and hypocrisy ... the MEDIA whether lazy or sensationalist cannot be bothered to be outraged about anything other than jeremiah wright ... they got a lil tight about the bosnia shit but they couldn't even bring themselves to call hills a liar.

what will they say, if anything, about the indiana factory the clintons helped to shut down?

and who wants a president clinton who has ALREADY pissed off the iranian government and who uses 'provocative and irresponsible' language?

i pasted the entire text of ben smith's blog, 'anger in tehran,' here:

The politics of threatening to "obliterate" Iran were apparently too good for either of Clinton's rivals to criticize her for making the threat.

But it has turned into a bit of a diplomatic flap:

Tehran, which insists its nuclear programme is solely for power generation, denounced her words as "provocative and irresponsible..

It said the remarks were "a flagrant violation" of the UN Charter.

In a letter to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon, Mehdi Danesh-Yazdi, Iran's deputy ambassador to the UN, said Mrs Clinton had "unwarrantedly and under erroneous and false pretexts threatened to use force against the Islamic Republic of Iran."

UPDATE:
i should ammend my question about the media ... and pose it just to cable news ... two news sources covered the iran story ... bbc and the nytimes are the ones i've seen so far ...

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

david sirota wrote this one - not the kid

i find this blogger, david sirota, to be very smart. i think his arguments about a 'race chasm' are right on point. you can find more of his blogs on this topic at huffington post and other sites.

here is his latest blog in its entirety (even the update at the bottom):

David Sirota
Pennsylvania & the Persistence of the Race Chasm
Posted April 23, 2008 | 10:00 AM (EST)

A few weeks ago, I published an article in In These Times showing how Hillary Clinton has been winning states almost exclusively in the Race Chasm - states whose populations are more than 6 percent but less than 17 percent black. The results of the Democratic primary in Pennsylvania - a state whose demographics fall squarely in the Race Chasm - continue the trend.

I have hypothesized that the Race Chasm exists because of racial politics. Specifically, in states where there is almost no black population, black-white racial politics has little traction because it isn't part of the political dialect. In states where there is a very large black population, the black vote can offset a racially motivated white vote. But in the Race Chasm, the black vote is too small to offset a racially motivated white vote.

So how prevalent was race as a factor in voting in Pennsylvania? The exit polls suggest that when Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell (D) previously said race would be a huge factor, he was absolutely correct. Specifically, page 4 and 5 of the CNN exit poll show a whopping 19 percent of Pennsylvania voters said race was an important factor in their vote, with Clinton winning almost 60 percent of that segment. Broken down further, 13 percent of the white vote said race was a major factor in their vote, with Clinton winning 75 percent of that group.

These are big numbers, especially considering the fact that these numbers only represent voters who are willing to admit to pollsters they are voting on race. The real number is probably much higher, because some voters may not want to disclose such taboo voting habits.

Let me reiterate something I wrote in my original Race Chasm analysis:

Clearly, race is not the only force moving votes. Demographic groups -- white, black or any other -- do not vote as monoliths. Additionally, the Race Chasm does not mean every white voter who votes against Obama nor every black voter who supports Obama is racially motivated.

However, considering the exit polling and the fact that Pennsylvania falls squarely in the demographic Race Chasm, it is clear that those who continue to pretend race is not a major factor in this campaign are deliberately averting their eyes from a very powerful force in the Democratic primary.

UPDATE: I should have added this into the original article. Some folks say that even discussing the Race Chasm is good or bad for one or another of the candidates in the primary or general election. That may or may not be true - but I don't really care. Political junkies tend to forget that the whole world does not revolve around the next election - and that yes - I know it's hard for some people to fathom - but some issues like racism are much bigger and more important than whatever election cycle we may be in. Racism is something that has been a part of American life for, oh, two centuries. If this presidential race is becoming a vehicle to talk about and confront and expose that racism, then that's a good thing - regardless of whichever candidates some think it may help or hurt.

Thursday, March 27, 2008

tastes great/less filling: we could all be wright

i read about 53 1/2 blogs a day. all about the u.s. democratic primary. i kinda skip mccain and nader blogs ... just not as riveting to me. i am admittedly obssessed and addicted to this 2008 political contest.

i even read pro-clinton blogs cuz i like to see how those human beings think and process info.

well there are a few nagging loose ends about rev wright that i think are dangling ... and obscuring clear vision ... the way a loose strand of hair gets in the faces of people who have straight hair or stray hairs ... but anyway

1) rev wright's sermons should not be discussed by anyone who has not seen the entire sermon -- i have heard some say that context is an 'excuse' used by pro-obama supporters. but context is neither partisan nor does it convey preferential treatment. it merely is. it is intellectually lazy to divorce speech (or anything else) from its context. however, language in particular cannot be taken out of context. it is ALWAYS context that defines the language in play (i challenge you to do your own research). take the example of the word "that". which "that" is she talking about? that 'that' or the other 'that'. well, maybe i'm talking about that one over there (don't get me started on there). over where? oh, you mean the person to whom i am speaking would have to be standing right next to me to understand what i mean by that? and this is not some indirect advocacy for bill clinton's is 'is' redefinitions. this is based on linguistic study i did once upon a time at grad school that i never imagined would have any real life impact on the real world. but 'that' and 'this' cannot be taken out of context.

well, before we get to the specific words rev wright issued let's try a less vague example. for all of you who are hard to persuade. let's take the word 'brother.' i would use nigga but that's very controversial ... so when a black man calls another black man whom he is not related to 'brother,' does it mean brother in the sibling sense? perhaps you would have to know the context of the situation: how are the two men connected to each other? in my hypothetical example they do not share any blood as it turns out. so here we see if we audio or videotaped their convo - splicing the word brother - we might assume ... that they did share at least one parent. never mind that the way in which 'brother' is defined here arises from the context of a specific black experience.

does the same word have the same meaning in a different context? let's say a white man comes in a restaurant that uh sells cheese and he approaches a black male salesperson by saying "hey, hook it up brudda" (and the white man puts extra emphasis on the 'dd' as opposed to the 'th' and he is sure to leave off the -er). how does the white man mean 'brother'? and how does his audience (of one) interpret the 'brother' claim? is the context important? what happens when the black cheese-seller then punches the white man in the face? can we conclude the black man took this form of 'brudda' as an insult? and what happens when the white man acts perplexed as to why a black man would take this as an insult? perhaps, yes, just perhaps (for all you doubters) context might inform the explanation of this situation. perhaps.

now, let's get to the actual beef. the soundbites of rev wright's sermon cannot stand alone. and i think the media is negligent in reporting on statements taken out of context. if we take statements away from their parent-statements, if you will, then all we are doing is using those words to be understood as we intend; not attempting to understand them as the speaker intended. we can take words out of context to convey ANY meaning we like. but then we cannot call that communication we must call it ... propaganda. you are using de-contextualized words to promote your own interpretation or agenda.

if rev wright had made a brief three-word proclamation such as, "God damn america." then he would have to be held accountable to that three-word statement. context would still have a very important role but there could be no waffling on what he meant by those words. rev wright's actual sermon references pacifism and the words of a white U.S. Ambassador who used malcolm x's famous phrase "the chickens have come home to roost."

now, i am happy to get into a debate with ANYONE who has listened to the ENTIRE sermon. that's fine ... i think we would end up disagreeing about foreign policy and not race.

2) rev wright aint spit no hate speech -- i am troubled by the majority of people who now quick-term rev wright's soundbites as 'hate speech.' again, if you've only heard the soundbites you might jump to that conclusion. but you'd be jumping not deducing with your intelligence. but all of that aside, even the soundbites alone do not point to HATE. they point to critique. and they also point to a very different perspective on america than we see in popular media and culture - what obama in his race speech termed distorted. i would not use the term distorted for rev wright because that lays a negative value on it. i don't think his perspective is any more negative than blind patriotism. they are just different. an analogy i like to use is the half empty/half full perspective. a blind patriot might see the glass (of america) half full. and rev wright definitely sees it half empty. obama's speech attempted to provide the context for rev wright's half empty perspective. rev wright views the black experience in america from the bottom up; from the position of the poorest of the poor; from the disenfranchised; as a recipient of the very worst legacies of america's history.

one could disagree with that perspective but should one totally discount it? and when we categorize this as hate speech are we missing half of the dialogue on race? rev wright referenced the notion that america gave black people AIDS ... is that hate? no. did he say i hate america for giving us AIDS? no. did he say i want to kill all white people because they caused 9/11? no. did rev wright accuse white people of certain things that may or may not be true? yes. is that hate? no.

when rev wright's words are reduced ... and reduction is the key process ... to hate speech they are very easily discarded and dismissed. the words become detached from real human meaning - whether you agree with the meaning or not. when rev wright's words are reduced to hate speech there can be no foundation for commonality and compassion and no path towards GREATER UNDERSTANDING; because by then the words have been simplified into pure hate: words easily tossed in the trash, picked off a sweater like lint, reduced like a sauce until they are just burnt up remnants on a frying pan. if those in the media and public sphere continue to mitigate rev wright's words to a little hate-filled corner we will continue to hate each other.

closing remarks:
i suggest that mainstream america is so unused to scathing criticism (since the loss of malcolm x) two things happen: 1) people percieve rev wright's words as hate speech, and 2) disconnection from those who are most critical about america and her history -- the disenfranchised -- deepens.

do i discount this perception on the part of the bloggers, the pundits, hillary clinton, joan walsh, pat buchanan, and even many people of color?

i am REALLY REALLY trying not to: that's why i wrote this blog. i do not want to discount the visceral reaction that likely 50-60% of america had to rev wright's soundbites ... because i understand what it's like to have a different perception of reality ... i understand what it's like to be discounted because i see things in a way you've never even conceived of.

i can only join the voices of those white and brown, yellow, and black alike (in the minority) who are calling on americans and the media to be their best selves ... to stop being intellectually lazy, and to start looking at why they are so hurt by the small number of words uttered by rev wright.

let LOVE rule!

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

THE rACE speech and doing it again

i would just like to take ALL credit for bam bam's race speech ... didn't i just predict that in my march 13th blog! i am laughing out loud because i am, of course, joking .... however, i was a little bit right ... obama gave THE race speech in philly on march 18th and you can find the transcript on huffingtonpost.com ...

i aint goin into the speech's brilliance ... i'm not going to skewer the speech to try to pick it apart and find all its fault lines ... i just don't find that work as interesting as assessing the reactions to the speech.

one reaction has got my drawers all bunched up round my hips ... and that is this sentiment as expressed by joan walsh (link: http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/?last_story=/opinion/walsh/2008/03/19/iraq/) she writes and i quote: "It was an intriguing leap, but I didn't buy it. I don't think Obama's elderly grandmother, who still lives in Hawaii and is reportedly too frail to travel, who was a product of her time and place and yet did her best to raise her half-black grandson, deserved to be compared to Wright, a public figure who's built his career around a particularly divisive analysis of American racial politics. It is easily the most tin-eared thing I've ever heard Obama say."

first i have to say that roger simon of politico.com expressed the same 'doubt' as joanie on msnbc's hardball with chris matthews just last night ... roger just didn't think the comparison between jeremiah wright and the white grandma is fair ... hmmm

second thought that comes to mind is .... bitches, please ...

let's dissect joan's language ... "hawaii," "frail," "a product of her time and place," "yet did her best," "half-black grandson"..... WOW joan come on ... are you saying the grandma is excused because she was a product of her time? or because she did her best? is wright not a product of his time? are we not all a product of our time? and even more so a product of our environment and stuck to our context? and why did you use half-black and not half-white? is that to imply the extra challenge the charitable white grandmother had to face - almost as if he was half-wild? and what the fuck does hawaii have to do with anything? joan, you wrote it like her 'still' being on an island of perceived peace and tranquility means she is in fact THE island of peace and tranquility! what does hawaii have to with it? is it too pretty a place for a racist grandma to have a house?

joan uses these words for rev. wright: "a public figure," "built ... on divisive analysis," ... so because he is in public he is no longer doing his best nor is he a product of his time ... and rev. wright's divisive analysis is MORE divisive than the white grandma's fear of black men who pass her on the street, joan? huh joan? is it just more divisive FOR YOU? or are you deciding for america? who's divisiveness is more grounded in fact and research: rev. wright or white grandma?

joan walsh, roger simon and others ... you're doing it again ... you feel empathy for a racist white grandma you feel distrust for an angry black preacher ... you understand the white grandma don't you? you can't comprehend a preacher who spits american critique? you are a victim of the ignorance obama mentioned in his speech ... you are issuing a double standard ... you still don't get it, you still don't want to try to understand jeremiah wright but you are more than happy to justify the lil white grandma ...

it's funny cuz as a kid growing up in a multi-racial house ... i got more races in me than obama so ha ... it was always MORE hurtful to hear racism from a loved one than from a street corner or a TV ... it effected my psyche much deeper that my grandparents could fear black people and love me at the same time ... i didn't care about the david dukes, pat buchanans and the ronald reagans ... they didn't feed me and tuck me in at night ... when it comes from our family the intolerance feels more intolerable ... the dynamic goes like this: a little brown girl can't fathom how her grandparents can hate half of her heritage so it makes her hate people who hate her cuz if her grandparents can know this little brown girl and claim to love her but they can't love her other people then the little girl assumes that nothing will ever make her grandparents or other racists realize that black people are human too ... but that's a side note.

my main thrust is ... white people ... you doing it again

my less main and more sub-thrust is ... the race speech at least helps bring all this out ... all the emotional poison (see don miguel ruiz) and i guess i feel that i don't need to discuss the merits or demerits of the speech cuz i know what's true ... that speech is true ... it could've been truer ... and no presidential election, or for-profit TV show, or cheap blog, or political pundit, or ohio voter can erase the truth ... and even if it takes another 50 years or 100 years the truth will stand ... even if obama loses it all ... the truth will stand ... even if joan walsh never agrees with me ... the truth will stand ... and that truth is: both jeremiah wright and the lil white grandma are BOTH HUMAN and only God can judge them.

i wanna love you joan walsh ... my grandparents keep getting in my way ... one day i won't be doing the same shit ...... again.

let's hear that speech again!